Eva Bennemann vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Eva Bennemann and Jasmijn Gimbrere compare in second serve points? Recently, Jasmijn Gimbrere has a slight edge, winning 39.92% compared to Eva Bennemann's 36.75%.
• In terms of return game stats from recent matches, Jasmijn Gimbrere has outperformed Eva Bennemann slightly on opponents' second serve returns, with 53.10% versus 50.29%.
• First serve return stats show a contrast where Eva Bennemann has an upper hand at 38.00%, compared to Jasmijn Gimbrere's 34.76%.
• Under pressure, Jasmijn Gimbrere saves more breakpoints at 46.99%, while Eva Bennemann saves 45.11%.
• Overall, Eva Bennemann has had a more successful match-winning rate over the past year, with 71.43% compared to Jasmijn Gimbrere's 53.23%.
• On I.hard courts, both players boast a win rate of 86%; however, Eva Bennemann performs better on hard courts compared to Jasmijn Gimbrere's performance on grass where she struggles.
• At Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, Eva Bennemann has a higher win rate of 61.54% relative to Jasmijn Gimbrere's 52.83%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Eva Bennemann has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 378.31, whereas Jasmijn Gimbrere's opponents averaged a rank of 435.42.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Jasmijn Gimbrere appears more resilient, winning 71% of those sets, compared to Eva Bennemann's 50% success rate.
• Regarding breakpoint opportunities, Eva Bennemann converts at a higher rate of 48.24%, against Jasmijn Gimbrere's 39.20% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (November 18, 2025, UTC):

Both players demonstrate areas of strength and opportunity when examining recent performance statistics. Jasmijn Gimbrere slightly leads in second serve success and the ability to save breakpoints, suggesting composure under pressure.

Eva Bennemann counters with a superior ability to convert breakpoint opportunities and a stronger winning percentage in both matches and against higher-ranked opponents, indicating confidence and experience as potential differentiators.

Despite Jasmijn Gimbrere's advantage in deciding set outcomes, Eva Bennemann's consistent match success and surface versatility give her a competitive edge. Based on these comparisons, Eva Bennemann is most likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming match.